Press "Enter" to skip to content

Town hall on saving Elizabeth St. Garden will pitch community land trust alternative

BY THE VILLAGE SUN | A town hall meeting about ongoing efforts to save the Elizabeth Street Garden — including the idea of preserving it as a conservation land trust — will be held in the Little Italy green oasis on the evening of Tues., June 21.

Garden members continue to fight in court to stop the city’s plan to build Haven Green, a senior affordable-housing development, on the garden, which spans from Elizabeth Street to Mott Street, midblock between Prince and Spring Streets. The lot is city-owned land, but has been leased to the garden on a month-to-month basis for more than two decades.

Meanwhile, the garden’s operating body, Elizabeth Street Garden, Inc., is also pushing a plan to preserve the garden as what is known as a conservation land trust. There are a number of Downtown gardens that are currently in land trusts, either individually or as part of a group.

The Toyota East Children’s Learning Garden, at 603 E. 11th St., and the Dorothy Streslin Memorial Community Garden, at 174 Suffolk St., for example, are part of the New York Restoration Project, a multi-site land trust. The Manhattan Land Trust, another multi-site land trust, includes 11th Street Community Garden, at 422 E. 11th St.; Albert’s Garden, at 18 E. Second St.; All People’s Garden, at 295 E. Third St.; Lower East Side People Care, at 25 Rutgers St.; and Parque de Tranquilidad, at 318 E. Fourth St.

Another option would be to make the Elizabeth Street Garden permanent parkland under the jurisdiction of the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation. But one advantage of putting the green space into a C.L.T. would mean the city would not have to pay any money toward the garden’s ongoing maintenance and operation.

E.S.G., Inc., has issued a report on the C.L.T. concept complete with an extensive list of area businesses and organizations that wholeheartedly support the plan.

The town hall will begin at 6:30 p.m. with a welcoming, an introduction and updates on the legal case.

At 7 p.m., the presentation on the community land trust proposal will begin, with the report projected on a screen. That will be followed by a conversation between Joseph Reiver, the garden’s executive director, and Lincoln Anderson, the editor of The Village Sun, on the pros and cons of saving the garden as a C.L.T. versus as a Parks Department property.

At 7:45 p.m., there will be a Q&A with questions submitted earlier by the audience, after which the floor — or the lawn — will be opened up to more questions from the public.

Garden advocates back an alternative plan for the Haven Green project — namely, to relocate it to the vacant, city-owned site at Hudson and Clarkson Streets on the West Side. They maintain that five times as much affordable housing could be built on the site, which sits atop a watershaft to the Third City Water Tunnel. When the City Council approved the Soho/Noho rezoning last year, the Hudson Street site, in fact, was cited as a spot earmarked for 100 units of affordable housing. Even so, the city is also still pushing ahead with the Haven Green project at the Elizabeth Street Garden.

3 Comments

  1. LES3025 LES3025 June 20, 2022

    “Garden advocates back an alternative plan for the Haven Green project — namely, to relocate it to the vacant, city-owned site at Hudson and Clarkson Streets on the West Side.”

    This is not true. This newspaper published an op-ed from a “garden advocate” arguing against building housing at the alternate site (https://thevillagesun.com/opinion-how-many-concrete-caverns-does-greenwich-village-need). Others might not actively oppose the new site, but if a decision were made to relocate Haven Green there, they would consider their job done and would not help in the fight for 388 Hudson. The alternate site has always been a stalking horse to obfuscate that the “garden advocates” do not support building any new housing.

    • The Village Sun The Village Sun Post author | June 20, 2022

      Umm, Community Board 2, which backs the plan for the alternate site and saving the garden, might disagree with you. Yes, Lynn Pacifico backs saving the garden but want 388 Hudson St. developed as a park / dog run, but she is not speaking for everyone who opposes the Haven Green project at Elizabeth Street Garden.

      • LES3025 LES3025 June 20, 2022

        I will wait to hear what CB2 says once a resolution for 388 Hudson is actually in front of them. I have a strong suspicion we’re going to get more “alternate sites” or “affordable for whom?” once it’s actually on the table. Lynn Pacifico may only speak for herself in that op-ed, but I think she’s saying the quiet part out loud.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Mission News Theme by Compete Themes.