Press "Enter" to skip to content

Opinion: Parks Department continues disinformation on park rules

BY ROBERT LEDERMAN | A recent article in The Village Sun (“Park goes to pot; Washington Square now a cannabis casbah,” Oct. 13) described vendors in Washington Square Park freely and openly selling marijuana and alcohol and other merchandise.

One day later in a subsequent Village Sun article (“Up in smoke: Parks Dept., police crack down on Washington Square pot bazaar,” Oct. 14 ), Parks and the New York Police Department announced a crackdown, claiming that no vending is allowed in the park.

You might think The Village Sun got the story wrong. The reality is that the Parks Department has told so many lies about the park rules that not even the Park Enforcement Patrol (PEP) officers know what’s legal and what isn’t.

I spent 20 years in court suing the Parks Department over its rules as applied to artists. What I found was that Parks officials routinely lie to the PEP officers, reporters, vendors and to federal judges about what the rules actually are and how they are enforced.

In each of my federal lawsuits the lawyers for the Parks Department committed numerous acts of perjury, both in written briefs and in oral testimony, before federal judges. They lied about what the rules were; how they were enforced; who they were or were not enforced against; and why the rules were created in the first place. The three Parks commissioners I personally dealt with during those years also lied on a routine basis to reporters and judges about what the rules were.

During the course of the lawsuits, they frequently temporarily changed the rules, so as to confuse the judges about each and every aspect of enforcement. Part of the reason the PEP officers are so ineffective when it comes to enforcement is that the Parks Department lies to them, as well. I’ve never met any PEP officer that actually knew the park rules.

Kanami Kusajima dances while “painting” with sumi ink in Washington Square Park.

What follows is a very brief outline of the park vending rules as applied to artists and performers as modified in 2010. To read the full text of the rules see expressive-matter-faq.pdf.

No one can sell anything in any New York City park without a Parks Department permit. The exceptions are vendors who have bought a Parks Department concession; visual artists selling paintings, books, prints, photos or sculptures; or performers. Performers are allowed to solicit and accept donations but not to sell anything (although most are selling CDs and other merchandise).

Artists and performers need no permit based on the lawsuits by A.R.T.I.S.T. (my organization) and the First Amendment. In four parks (Union Square Park, the High Line, portions of Central Park and Battery Park) artists and performers must sell from locations marked by a tiny handful of medallions. There is no medallion system in Washington Square Park, though.

In addition to the requirement in the four parks mentioned above to stand on a medallion, artists and performers (but not concession vendors), in general, must be 50 feet from any park monument or fountain; on a path or sidewalk that’s at least 12 feet wide; at least 5 feet from any bench, tree, sign or park furniture; and not on the grass.

Artists and performers cannot take up more space than 8 linear feet by 3 linear feet.

No one can sell clothing, jewelry or crafts on the street or in any park without a vending license, based on the Street Vendor Project losing a federal appeals case, Mastrovincenzo v City of NY, 2006. The exception is materials with a First Amendment-protected message, such as politics or religion.

Now here’s the problem in Washington Square Park. Due to all the trees, benches, the narrow paths, the fountain, etc., there is no legal space in all of Washington Square Park to legally vend. In this brief video clip, below, PEP officers in the park explain this fact to artist Joe Mangrum:

So, in other words, all the vending in Washington Square Park other than the hot dog cart concession is technically illegal. Likewise, virtually all the performers are violating numerous sections of the rules, such as, on keeping their distance from objects; playing on park paths that are the required width; selling versus soliciting donations; using tables or stands of any kind; and using amplified music. Needless to say, vending marijuana and alcohol is not allowed.

Vendors who call or visit the Parks Department to find out what is or is not legal are routinely misinformed about the rules. While the rules are written in black and white, the enforcement changes day by day. No one, including the PEP officers, can ever be sure what the rules that will be enforced are.

Aside from all the lying about the vending rules, city officials and the N.Y.P.D. are also feeling a lot of heat over making vending arrests that are perfectly legitimate. For example, a number of arrests of immigrant food vendors who completely flouted the laws exploded into widespread negative coverage about vending enforcement. That, in turn, has caused the N.Y.P.D. to become very hesitant to enforce any vending laws, for fear they will be depicted as racist. This explains why people could set up alcohol and marijuana stands in a New York City park where vending of any kind is basically illegal.

What is needed is for the Parks Department to revise the vending rules so as to make them clear, unbiased and equally enforced. The distance from benches, fountains, monuments and trees should be modified to a reasonable distance. The medallion requirement should be eliminated altogether. Artists and performers, both fully protected by the First Amendment, should have the same exact rules and be enforced against the same. However, they have not been enforced against the same, ever.

When government officials consistently lie about what the laws are, you can’t expect vendors, artists and performers to do anything other than make up their own rules.

Lederman is president, A.R.T.I.S.T. (Artists’ Response to Illegal State Tactics)

6 Comments

  1. Caroline Zuccaro Caroline Zuccaro October 16, 2021

    Old adage: A dead fish stinks at the head first.
    That Fish is Community Board 2.
    They’ve mismanaged this park for years with no plan in sight, time for change.

  2. Armando Crescenzi Armando Crescenzi October 16, 2021

    It is unbelievable how the city can strip away First Amendment rights with local vending regulations, and so ridiculous to see artists compete for spots behind a medallion.

  3. john wetherhold john wetherhold October 17, 2021

    This is not news only information. the real news would be that the city tells the truth about many of its harmful initiatives. It sure is a funny way to carry on the rule of law.

  4. C.J. Scheiner C.J. Scheiner October 17, 2021

    Why not do in the parks what they did in Times Square – clearly indicate where specific commercial and artistic activities are legal? Or is that too logical?

  5. Jane Doe Jane Doe October 17, 2021

    I disagree with this person’s opinion about how space and sound in our public park should be managed. In a city filled with performance spaces and art galleries, I think that parks should be reserved for nature, open space and quiet. I say this as a lifelong resident of the area surrounding Washington Square Park and the child of an artist and a performer. Let the park be a park — not a theater or a gallery or, most of all, a space filled with individuals using it to earn a buck!

    • Robert Lederman Robert Lederman October 18, 2021

      First Amendment rights apply the most in a traditional public forum, such as a public park. In its 1939 decision Hague v. C.I.O. the U.S. Supreme Court explained: “Wherever the title of streets and parks may rest, they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mission News Theme by Compete Themes.