Press "Enter" to skip to content

‘Ink dancer’: Don’t broad-brush me with sound-permit rule

BY LINCOLN ANDERSON | When Kanami Kusajima performs her sumi-ink dances in Washington Square Park, she’s in her own zone, in a Zen-like state. In fact, she kneels on the ground facing the arch and meditates briefly beforehand to get in the proper mindset — or lack of mind.

As she then starts to dance atop the canvas, she deliberately slashes her feet and hands through the ink, creating swooshes, smears and Jackson Pollock-like drizzles. Eventually, she rolls and sloshes her entire body about in the sumi. The result is a riveting dance performance — plus, a unique, though sometimes ripped, piece of artwork.

But now there’s something else on the dancer’s mind, intruding on her artistic bliss and focus: the fear that police or Park Enforcement Patrol officers, at any time, could order her to shut off the small speaker she uses to play music to accompany her performances. The tunes are essential to her art, she says.

It’s ironic because the city is currently using a photo of Kusajima dancing in the park in an ad as part of its No Stopping New York recovery campaign.

On Aug. 19 as she was doing her usual performance, two police and two PEP officers came up and told her she could not use the mini-speaker because it violated the park’s rules on amplified sound. In order to use amplified sound in the park, they explained, you must have a permit, per a long-standing rule on the books.


View this post on Instagram


A post shared by Let Hair Down (@lethairdown)

As Kusajima has noted before, though, her JBL Charge 4 speaker has a maximum volume of only 80 decibels, which is lower than acoustic drums, which can get as loud as 100 decibels. But the officers shrugged that the rules are the rules.

Five days later, a cop again confronted her and told her she could not use the speaker.


View this post on Instagram


A post shared by Let Hair Down (@lethairdown)

“They are taking advantage of my art for their advertisement purpose, and they don’t support me at all,” she protested. “Instead they crack me down. This makes zero sense.”

Police and PEP’s started cracking down on amplified sound in May after complaints by local residents about late-night raves and crowds in the park. However, amplified sound in the park has been an issue for at least the past year.

Kusajima’s situation previously came up at a raucous Community Board 2 meeting on July 21 about Washington Square Park. A young speaker questioned Captain Stephen Spataro, the Sixth Precinct’s commanding officer, about the clampdown on amplified noise, specifically asking why they are doing enforcement against the Japanese dancer with her low-power speaker. The man claimed officers had actually confiscated her speaker.

“You couldn’t hear it 20 feet away,” he scoffed. “We’re talking about a tiny, shoebox-size amplifier. This blanket policy is wrong for everybody.”

However, Spataro said police must do “consistent enforcement” on amplifiers, otherwise there would be “accusations of unequal enforcement.”

“I don’t make the rules, I just enforce them,” the C.O. stated.

Kusajima, though, told The Village Sun: “They did not confiscate my speaker, but they told me not to use it. But music is an important part of my art form and that is essential for me. I should be allowed to use this speaker because New York City government admits that street performances are a part of New York culture by using my photo for their ad.”

She has employed the speaker since she first started performing in the Greenwich Village landmark park at the end of last November.

In March, Kusajima first told The Village Sun that PEP officers had warned her about using the speaker. Back then she started a petition, asking for the creation of an affordable “buskers permit.” She said that, as someone who performs in the park daily, she can’t afford $70 a day for a sound permit. There is also a $25 special-event sound permit, but that’s only for one-day events, she noted.

Her petition also advocates for legalizing certain types of small amps, plus allowing amps if they operate below a decibel threshold, which would have to be established.

Despite having now received several warnings, she persists in using the amp as she dances and “paints” in the park.

The mini-amp was on when two people came to take her photo for the No Stopping New York recovery ad.

“I was of course using the speaker and performing,” she said. “They like this form of my art and that is why they decided to talk to me to let me be a part of the project.”

“I should have a right to keep my art form for my artistic expression,” she declared, “especially when it is not disturbing any neighbors around the park and New York City government is acknowledging by using this photo that street performance is a part of New York culture.”

Meanwhile, as she whirls about and contorts her body, she continues to be mindful of what could intrude on her performance.

“Yes, I need to be prepared mentally every time I perform,” she said. “Being ready to explain my right as an artist and this contradiction with the No Stopping New York ad.

“Focusing to be aware of the state of myself, and be aware of the environment around me each time. And I will do my very best for every single moment, no matter what happens. I might get cracked down. I might get yelled at. I might get killed. I might experience robbery. I might experience racism. I might get threatened. But I will be fine as long as I stay true to myself, no matter what happens.

“I’ve had racial slurs yelled at me, three attempted robberies — but people saved me and all of them failed, I didn’t lose any money,” she said. “So I got used to it. I am mentally ready for any possibilities which might happen to me. Every day.”


  1. tiago tiago August 26, 2022

    i’ve seen this woman performing many times. what she is doing is not art. it just goes to show how anyone can roll around on the floor with ink and call that art. it looks messy and disgusting if you ask me. thats like me splashing some paint against the wall and calling it art. or me smearing ketchup all over myself and call that art. come on man. if i wanted art, i’ll go to a museum. if i wanted to see someone dance, i’ll go to lincoln center. if Kusajima was any good, she wouldnt be in wsp for 2 yrs with no real job. and one would argue if you were a good dancer, you wouldnt be at wsp performing at all. you would think that if your dance had value to it, that someone would have hired her to perform on a profesional level. 2yrs is a long time. shes at wsp day in and day out. thats alot of exposure to all sorts of people. the fact that no one has offered her a job, or pointed her in the direction to one means that what she is doing is probably not that valuable. she says she graduated from suny 2yrs ago. that means that while she was at suny, she didnt do her job at networking, and therefore, she never got an actual dancing job. or maybe shes just not a good dancer. i never did consider rolling around in ink to be dance. also, no one should be able to play amplified music anywhere whether its a park, or a street corner. it is annoying and instrusive. if i want to listen to music, i put on head phones, and so should you. no one wants to hear your music.

  2. Robert Lederman Robert Lederman September 16, 2021

    NYC officials have done this trick before. Back in 1995 at the height of the street artist arrests, when Giuliani administration officials were claiming that street artists were a plague on the city, they were running ads in travel magazines claiming that street artists were a great reason to visit NYC. One ad featured a handwritten letter a tourist wrote to Mayor Giuliani stating that meeting a street artist and buying a painting from him or her was the highpoint of their visit to the Big Apple. Today, the city proudly advertises a program to financially assist artists affected by the pandemic at the same time it still harasses artists trying to make a living without a government handout. City officials and real estate interests like BIDs consistently use artists and art as a featured attraction to lure tourists and raise property values, then turn on the artists themselves. The wealthy people who run the Washington Square Park Conservancy want to appear to be patrons of the artists. In reality they are the enemy of artistic freedom.

  3. Amedeo Chenier Amedeo Chenier September 15, 2021

    An astonishing example of narcissistic personality disorder. What are the “rights” of an artist? The community decided long ago that it does not wish to be subjected to amplified sound. This young lady seems incapable of considering the people she might be disturbing with the noise that accompanies her unsolicited performances.

  4. starship troop starship troop September 15, 2021

    incredible how this idiot
    thinks that she is above the law


    put on your “BIG GIRL” panties

    and move on

    • Kate K. Kate K. December 14, 2021

      Not too long ago, in history of this country, racial segregation was legal. In a certain area, even murders against a specific race were legal. Those laws were abolished by now because those laws were wrong and against human rights. Laws are not always right because laws are made by humans who are imperfect. It is dangerous to believe that laws are always the justice. Also, the United Nations states in Article 27 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that everyone has the right to freely participate in the cultural life of the community, either alone or in collaboration with others. Artistic expression has to be protected as a human right, especially when the artist is not disturbing any neighbors around the community and respectfully offering her art to the community.

    • Tanya Tanya December 14, 2021

      Your tag name says it all, “starship troop.” There is one set of rules enforced for one race and another for all others. Hope you grow as human being. She isn’t breaking any laws and the music is not loud at all.

Leave a Reply

Mission News Theme by Compete Themes.