Press "Enter" to skip to content

Foes fight Two Bridges developer Joe Chetrit, demand Buildings Department deny work permits

BY DASHIELL ALLEN | Chinatown and Lower East Side organizations rallied together outside the Department of Buildings’ offices near City Hall on Mon., April 11, calling on the agency to “check [Joseph] Chetrit,” the real estate developer who plans to build two “megatowers” along the East River.

Activists and Chinatown residents, organized by CAAAV Organizing Chinatown, Good Old Lower East Side (G.O.L.E.S.), and Tenants United Fighting for the Lower East Side (TUFF-LES), among other groups, are concerned that the development of the two towers — at 64 and 70 stories tall — will trigger the mass displacement of low-income immigrant residents, as well as endanger the health of surrounding communities.

They called on D.O.B. to revoke the Chetrit Group’s work permits, and to respond to a letter they sent the agency last week.

“Stop the towers!” they chanted. “Save our homes! We can’t wait! Chinatown is not for sale! Bullies not welcome!”

Opposition to the impending construction of four supertall towers along South Street in the Two Bridges neighborhood of the Lower East Side has been a rallying cry for many in Lower Manhattan since before 2018.

Now, according to Assemblymember Yuh-Line Niou, who spoke at the rally, developers across the city are rushing to break ground on projects in the next 10 weeks, before New York State’s 421a tax-abatement program, often criticized as a blatant developer giveaway, expires in June.

“There are folks that are going to try to push through for emergency permits, for rapid permits, for permits to try to speed up different kinds of developments right now, because the Legislature has let expire 421a,” Niou said. “We’re here today because we know the true cost of the out-of-scale megadevelopments that ignore the needs of the community, like the one that Chetrit is trying to push through in the last days of the 421a program.

Four more megatowers are slated to be built along the waterfront in the Two Bridges neighborhood. (Photo by Dashiell Allen)

“We do have a housing crisis in this city, we recognize that,” Niou said. “There is a shortage of units and we need to build to make up for that. But we need to build according to need and not according to greed.”

Alina Shen, a lead organizer with CAAAV, said, “421a helps developers avoid taxes for 25 years. To avoid paying taxes, Chetrit will endanger workers, accelerate displacement and introduce toxic hazards into our neighborhoods. Historically Chetrit does not respect department safety, does not respect workers’ lives, and does not respect the Department of Buildings.”

At the beginning of April the property at 265 South St., the planned future home of two towers, was sold by L+M and CIM Group to Chetrit Group for $78 million. L+M is also in the process of purchasing the neighboring low-income apartment complex Knickerbocker Village.

A representative for the Chetrit Group was not available for comment, and L+M did not immediately respond to a request from The Village Sun.

“We must stand against gentrification,” said Xue Ming Liang, a 24-year resident of Chinatown and co-founder of the Chinatown Tenants Union. “I have seen the change as Chinatown is gradually being gentrified. … Chetrit Group is going to force the eviction of residents of Chinatown for the construction of these high-rise luxury towers. This is forced displacement of low-income residents. This is racism! … If these luxury towers are built it will cause rents to rise and prices to rise.”

Activists also took issue with developers in New York City that look the other way at dangerous workplace conditions, quite literally putting profit over people.

Diana Moreno, the interim executive director of New Immigrant Community Empowerment (NICE), said, “It is a lot of the time immigrant Latino workers who die at the hands of negligent developers,” citing the death last week of Holger Molino-Pinos, an Ecuadorian immigrant, who fell off a building in Queens.

Protesters also pointed out the environmental impact of the planned Two Bridges development, given that it would be built on the site of a former gas station.

“Chetrit’s towers are polluting our air and land,” said Daniel Alayo-Matos, an organizer with Good Old Lower East Side. “Several harmful contaminants have been found in the soil on site, but still the community has received no comprehensive report from developers about the findings and the steps they intend to take to mitigate the harm to the surrounding area.”

The demonstrators held protest signs and caricatures of developer Joseph Chetrit. (Photo by Dashiell Allen)

Previously, residents of Lands End II, a neighboring Section 8 apartment complex, told The Village Sun their apartments’ floors were tilting, due to their buildings’ instability. They expressed concern that any construction could put them in immediate danger.

On Wed., April 7, CAAAV and other organizations, along with more than 100 Chinatown and Two Bridges residents, sent a letter to the Department of Buildings requesting that it revoke its approval for excavation and foundation permits submitted to the department — given that separately submitted permits for construction haven’t been finalized.

“The disruption of excavation and foundation work on the thousands of low-income residents of this neighborhood, many of whom are seniors, will be grave,” their letter warned. “To consider that the Department could approve such a disruption with no outcome guaranteed is shocking.”

Shortly after Monday’s rally a few activists entered D.O.B.’s offices where they hand-delivered their letter to the acting commissioner’s chief of staff and the deputy commissioner.

In a response letter reviewed by The Village Sun, D.O.B. stood by its approval of the Chetrit Group’s excavation and foundation work permits, while acknowledging that, simultaneously, “associated permits have been requested, but have not yet been issued.”

D.O.B. spokesperson Andrew Rudansky told The Village Sun, “The applications for the Support of Excavation (SE) and the Foundation (FO) associated with this new tower project were approved last week, after D.O.B. plan examiners determined that all required items associated with the applications had been properly submitted, and that the plans complied with applicable Code and Zoning regulations.” He added, “Our Codes here in NYC allow applicants to proceed with earthwork and foundation approvals prior to full new building approvals, if they submit certain required items.”

Rudansky also clarified that “D.O.B. does not have discretionary approval in this process, meaning that if an application complies with our Codes and regulations, we cannot choose to deny it.”

Members of New Immigrant Community Empowerment (NICE) warned of the ever-present risk of construction-site accidents. (Photo by Dashiell Allen)

The community groups have since then filed a zoning challenge through their counsel, Paula Segal, senior staff attorney with TakeRoot Justice, of D.O.B.’s acceptance for consideration of additional building permits. The challenge argues that the two proposed towers do not conform to the area’s zoning within the “Two Bridges Large Scale Residential Development” area, given that the opponents believe the City Planning Commision did not adequately consider the project’s “impacts on air and light, open space and the character of the existing community as planned.”

That argument was actually the basis for one of several lawsuits, including another alleging the “megatowers” should be subject to the city’ sUniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) — all of which were rejected by the Court of Appeals last year.

Despite D.O.B.’s reluctance, the activists are still hoping that their actions — be it their letter or zoning challenge — will lead the agency to reverse course and revoke the permits.

At the same time, CAAAV, GOLES, TUFF-LES and other groups are also pursuing a rezoning plan that they say would stop all four proposed towers dead in their tracks.

The Two Bridges Community Plan, which they have been working on for the past five years, would cap building heights in the neighborhood, making it impossible for a developer to build taller without obtaining a special zoning variance.

“This is the year that all of these things are coming to a head,” CAAAV organizer Shen told The Village Sun. “We can only stall the towers so much. And so, at the end of the day, really the only thing that can stop the developers from building is our land-use policy plan.”

(Photo by Dashiell Allen)

The Two Bridges Plan is actually a subsection of a larger Lower East Side and Chinatown rezoning plan known as the Chinatown Working Group.

“Developers a lot of the time submit rezonings, and then they get those passed in at most two years,” Shen said. “But communities, when they submit plans, it takes years and years of resources.”

She noted that the Two Bridges plan is in the final stages of its environmental review before entering ULURP. She believes the earliest the scheme could pass is by this coming September.

If Chetrit Group or any other developer were to complete the foundation before then, though, then any modification to the zoning codes would not prevent them from exceeding newly imposed height restrictions.

With the fate of the Two Bridges towers appearing to still be up in the air, activists remain hopeful that the buildings will be prevented from rising up next to One Manhattan Square, the only one of the megatowers to be built so far.

If they’re unsuccessful, though, Shen said, “The neighborhood will be irrevocably changed.”


  1. JJ JJ April 13, 2022

    The big lie is our progressive political leaders want to help the little people and us poors.

    Reality is former King De Blasio and Hochul and their ilk say all the friendly stuff to us, but then take the baksheesh from the developers for their “campaign.”

    Towers always get built, poor are ignored, Manhattan grows. But after all the fighting, poor move out, richies come in. Who cares?

    The fact Two Bridges has these beautiful views and the river was just great for me to enjoy, and now some richie rich can have the same fun, while paying 50% more.

    It’s called urban renewal and it’s the real business here.

  2. JJ JJ April 13, 2022

    Living there for 10 years. This is too little too late. Call Margaret Chin and the other sleazeballs who let all this be approved years ago. Woops.

    Not sure about the displacement argument, except for the buildings that get torn down. The Seaport Square took over a flooded out supermarket.

    The big change would be if these residents actually go to the neighborhood stores — but they don’t. They hop in cars and zoom up the FDR.

    The “ugly” bit is the skyline, but you get used to it. As for gentrification, well, every tenement building that is sold to be knockdown (see Henry St.) becomes a shiny skyscraper with 2x – 4x the existing rents. Such is life in NYC.

    We are moving out of our place – landlord is now offering our $3k/mo pad for $4.5k.

  3. LES3025 LES3025 April 12, 2022

    Disappointing to see local leaders and tenants-rights advocates push the false idea that new construction like this will cause displacement. I’m not a big fan of these towers, but this misinformation is bad, and hurts our ability to produce much-needed housing.

      • LES3025 LES3025 April 13, 2022

        Like I said before, I’m not him. If you want to talk to him, you should try on Twitter.

        • The Village Sun The Village Sun Post author | April 13, 2022

          You guys are at least good buddies, though, right?

          • LES3025 LES3025 April 13, 2022

            Hardly know the guy. Maybe he read my posts here and decided to follow me on Twitter. Couldn’t say.

        • fuelgrannie fuelgrannie April 13, 2022

          K but Twitter isn’t real life, LES3025. Speaking of which, who are you in real life? You’ve created this anonymous persona on various sites where you defend the OpenNY party line: people think you’re either Ben Carlos Thypin or Michelle Kuppersmith because, really, who else would you be? This isn’t YIMBYtown

          • LES3025 LES3025 April 14, 2022

            If Twitter isn’t real life, why did you get so mad when you got banned? Anyways, I said I’m not Ben and I don’t know a Michelle, but beyond that, this obsession with me is getting a bit weird. Thanks for reading my posts though! Glad to know I have dedicated fans.

        • fuelgrannie fuelgrannie April 14, 2022

          You don’t have “fans,” LES3025: We’re curious to know who you are and why you insist on being anonymous, which remains curious, suspicious and telling. Who are you, LES3025? You’re definitely part of predatory, self-funded, real estate development lobbying group Open New York, but who exactly are you?

Leave a Reply

Mission News Theme by Compete Themes.