BY LINCOLN ANDERSON | It’s a newspaper, though now it’s actually two newspapers. It’s WestView News and it’s New WestView News. It’s a bit of a whacky Greenwich Village soap opera. And, well, people just can’t seem to get enough of this hyped-up hyperlocal media drama. …
So far, in an ongoing series of articles in The Village Sun, we’ve heard, on the one side, from George Capsis, the 95-year-old founder and publisher of WestView News, and also more recently from Dusty Berke, his caretaker and “right hand” who, as of November, has been promoted to the paper’s managing editor.
On the other side, we’ve also heard from Democratic District Leader Arthur Schwartz, the senior editor of the upstart New WestView News.
The New Yorker magazine has reportedly gotten onto the story, too — though by the time its article comes out, you might have already read many of the gory details in this newspaper.
In addition, The Village Sun also recently spoke to Kim Plosia, who was WestView News’s managing editor and art director and who has now taken on those roles at New WestView News, the new breakaway paper that has infuriated Capsis.
“It really has the qualities of a soap opera…having lived it,” Plosia reflected.
Plosia started working at WestView News seven and a half years ago after moving to Greenwich Village from New Jersey. Having retired from a career in Web development, she said she took on the job as a designer at the paper because she was interested in learning more about her new neighborhood and also, frankly, because she was bored not working. In the past few years, after the paper had cycled through a number of editors, she found herself promoted to that role, as well.
“I started out as a designer, laying the paper out,” she said. “I kept inheriting other jobs. I call myself the accidental editor.”
A big traveler, during the pandemic, she relocated to outside the city and is currently living on Block Island, Rhode Island.
“I’m all over the place,” she said. “I don’t even know where I should be filing my taxes.”
Plosia’s father was a longtime newspaper reporter and columnist in Jersey, so she felt like she was tapping into the family tradition by joining WestView. And she had also worked at a community newspaper in the Garden State when she was just starting out, so it all felt like “coming full circle,” she said.
“I am 67 years old,” she noted. “This is not a career move for me, a $10-an-hour job. It’s not The New York Times but I take it seriously.”
As Plosia tells it, working at WestView was always pretty tumultuous, but things worsened when Berke came on the scene about six years ago.
“I can’t tell you how many times I quit,” Plosia told The Village Sun. “It was a volatile situation.”
Her late father, though, always advised her to hang in there.
“He would say, ‘If that man can put out a paper at 90, he deserves all the help he can get,'” she said.
Capsis is known as charismatic yet also, at times, tempermental. But, according to Plosia, he was not the reason she bolted from WestView — though she faults him for allowing Berke’s power to grow.
“It was Dusty,” she stated. “I feel that [George] betrayed his newspaper and his staff.”
It’s well known that Schwartz and Berke, for years, have each individually coveted control of WestView News.
“To me, Arthur was always the heir apparent,” Plosia said. “We had a loose understanding of the agreement: If George became incapacitated, Arthur would be the one.”
She was referring to a 2013 deal, under which, in return for purchasing a certain number of full-page ads in WestView, Schwartz would get a 1 percent ownership stake in the newspaper. Should Capsis — who owned the other 99 percent of the paper’s stock — be unable to run the paper, Schwartz would take it over, per the agreement. However, Capsis and Berke claim the original agreement was invalid, plus point to a 2020 letter Schwartz signed that allegedly “voided” that earlier agreement anyway.
As for Berke, she started out “serving us coffee,” Plosia recalled. But Berke soon let it be known that, in fact, she hoped to buy WestView for the round sum of $100,000.
“The thing standing between her owning that paper was Arthur Schwartz,” Plosia said.
Meanwhile, Plosia is among those who think print newspapers sadly are not for long in this smartphone-centric world, where people, especially younger generations, are content to consume news on tiny screens.
“Dusty has latched onto the idea that the paper will be her cash cow,” Plosia said. “Please. Sit on a subway or anywhere that there’s no one holding anything. They’re on their phones — they live there.”
At any rate, Plosia said her biggest responsibility eventually became, in recent years, being “the gatekeeper,” meaning keeping Berke from inserting dubious content into the paper.
“I was the biggest resistance she had for two years,” she said, though adding, “It just became impossible.”
Berke had no official title on the paper’s masthead, yet would attend meetings at which the monthly editorial content was discussed. Meanwhile, at least one staffer bristled at Berke’s presence at the meetings, leaving her feeling snubbed.
Particularly frustrating, Plosia said, were deadline days, when Berke would fight to get her preferred content into the paper — including last-minute, conspiracy-theory-type ads — sometimes forcing Plosia to run afoul of the printer’s deadline.
“It ruined my relationship with the printer,” she said. “I felt she was running a parallel newspaper to ours.”
Basically, Plosia said, Berke started acting like she was her boss.
“I would try to handle her on my own. Finally, I reached out to the ‘old guard’ about one year ago,” Plosia said, referring to a group of veteran contributing writers.
Articles and ads Berke promoted that troubled Plosia included ones by a “9/11 lawyers” group claiming 7 World Trade Center was brought down by a “controlled demolition or something like that,” she said.
“It started to get a little creepy,” she recalled. “I felt we were going down the rabbit hole with that 9/11 conspiracy stuff.”
Then there was the June back page “ad” that was reportedly not really a paid ad, showing Will Smith smacking Dr. Fauci and headlined, “The Slap That Cured The World.” The piece was created by Kambiz Shekdar, allegedly a friend of Berke.
“Was that insane?” Plosia quipped, in disbelief. “I suggested she launch a new paper called Exposed and I would design it free of charge. I said, ‘What you’re doing probably has a real audience.'”
Berke, though, recently shrugged to The Village Sun that she’s just “a California Democrat.” At the same time, she said, she does like to present opposing views and let educated readers reach their own conclusions.
Ultimately, the printer started deferring to Berke over Plosia, according to the latter, who was left feeling galled.
On the other hand, Plosia granted that Berke was “brilliant at selling. She’s a crackerjack salesperson,” she said.
In the past, Capsis had input into the paper’s contents, but that has waned, according to Plosia.
“The last year, I essentially put that paper out without his input at all. The only thing George ever cared about was the front page,” she maintained, though adding, “George is still commanding of Zoom meetings.”
Meanwhile, during the pandemic, with ad revenue down, Plosia voluntarily agreed to forgo her pay.
“I said, ‘Don’t worry. You don’t need to pay me now,'” she said. “But at the beginning of ’22, I said, ‘I need to start getting checks again.'”
But her checks never came — though other staffers were getting paid.
“George still owes me $25,000,” she said, “and I’m sure now I’ll never get it.
“I did not quit,” Plosia stressed. “I was fired halfway through [working on] the October issue.”
Capsis and Berke contend Plosia quit, with Capsis saying Plosia put the thought out there, to which he basically said, O.K., fine, then quit.
Plosia claimed Berke at times insulted her, noting, “Fortunately, I have very thick skin and no need to be liked.”
For her part, Berke says Plosia and Liza Whiting, who was WestView’s and now New WestView’s traffic manager, were “bullies” to her and never liked her, ever since she first moved into Capsis’s building — plus after she raked in $8,000 in ads for the first issue she worked on.
Plosia said Berke first came to the paper to do an article on the 9/11 tiles at Mulry Square, at Greenwich Avenue and Seventh Avenue South, that Berke has been involved in preserving, and moved right into Capsis’s building after he extended the invitation.
“He said she would be there if he fell down, and that she makes a good cup of coffee,” Plosia said.
Meanwhile, Plosia said of herself, Whiting and Darielle Smolian, the photo editor, who also made the jump to the new paper, “We put [the paper] out. We were a well-oiled machine.”
Berke said she liked Smolian and figured she “just went along for the ride” with the other two to the new publication.
Tim Jambeck, WestView’s distributor, has also switched over to New WestView News, to Capsis’s outrage.
“Keith Michael, the ‘Bird Man’ — he’s coming,” Plosia added of a popular WestView contributor who writes on the local nature scene.
As for how New WestView News actually came to be, it all happened very quickly, Plosia said.
“We did this in 10 days, in record time,” she said of producing the paper once the decision was reached.
Schwartz, Plosia and six other staffers and contributors — including Brian and Joy Pape and Maggie Berkvist — resolved to move forward with the new paper during a Zoom meeting on Nov. 20, less than two weeks before the new monthly would publish on Dec. 2.
Berkvist tragically died on Dec. 9 after a fall in the Village.
As for the new paper’s masthead, Plosia initially put Schwartz down as the publisher, but she said, “He removed it. He said, ‘I don’t want it. This is a collective.'”
Instead Schwartz is listed as senior editor.
There were some concerns raised during that initial Zoom meeting about the new paper’s name and design both mirroring WestView News, she said. Plosia said she and others asked Schwartz why they couldn’t just name the paper something clearly different, say, like West Village News.
“Some other names came up,” she said. “We weren’t really brainstorming anything creative.
“We said to Arthur from the get-go, just call it something else. We said that thing [WestView News] was going to die on its own.
“But Arthur said he wanted to go with it,” she said, “because there was an arrangement,” apparently referring to the 2013 agreement with Capsis, “and he felt they would work something out.”
As for West View News’s content, Plosia said if it morphs into a conservative or far-out paper, it’s not going to make it.
“You’re in the West Village — you think right wing is going to fly?” she scoffed.
Regarding New WestView News’s content, she knows Schwartz’s bent is toward politics, but she’d like to see it include lighter fare, as well.
But Plosia isn’t second-guessing her move.
“I’m glad that I’m here,” she said.
“That paper was stolen from him,” she said of Capsis and WestView News. “We didn’t do that.
“At some point, George was a real leader,” she reflected. “And then at some point he was a strong figurehead. He had real thoughts about what was going on in the neighborhood. Sometimes he was right. Sometimes he was petty. He’s not an easygoing guy, but that’s what made him interesting.
“When I did this issue,” she said, referring to the inaugural, December issue of New WestView News, “I thought I would feel good. But I felt really bad. I was thinking about George. … I guess it was time to move on.”
Lincoln Anderson’s article and analysis is as vapid and dumb as a gnat. How vile that he eggs on readers to bring on the popcorn for his “gory” details at the expense of a community leader such as George Capsis! Is the the reporting we want anywhere?
Says the reporter:
“The New Yorker magazine has reportedly gotten onto the story, too — though by the time its article comes out, you might have already read many of the gory details in this newspaper.”
Lincoln’s article is journalism at its lowest, little more than he-said, she-said gossip. Where is any insight into the legalities or ethics of what Arthur Schwartz and his cohort did, knowingly stealing a name and brand that Mr. Capsis developed and nurtured over 20 years? Is any of this the “editorial team” with judgment to trust with any news?
Personally, I noticed the caption of the photo was incorrect and changed, without noting the mistake. Does that live to any editorial standards? Or does Lincoln say what he chooses and switch it up the next day? Originally it read that the June back page Ad was an anti-vaccine Ad. It is Nothing of the sort. It is instead a parody that aims to shed light on the trajectory situation that we have today, where despite stem cells cures of AIDS having been demonstrated more than 15 years ago, our nation has done nothing to prioritize the development of a globally accessible cure.
A true community newspaper like WestView News sheds light on this important topics. Lincoln Anderson’s piece gloats at the expense of Mr. Capsis.
Continue to report on the dangers of 5G and serve the community!
Seems to me all who left the WestView News should be feeling pretty bad about themselves for pulling off a heist of George’s paper after his years of effort. Particularly after a hard three years of pandemic madness, and rough times for all small newspapers. Who is Schwartz to sweep in and decide he knows better and somehow deserves to take over someone else’s creation? Not a sign of good character or caring for rights of others despite a career as a lawyer and politician purportedly based on these qualities.
I hope George and Dusty can restaff and continue with WestView News until he chooses to retire. And I hope courts will find this act reprehensible and Illegal.
NWVN is a “Cheater Brand” of WVN. Even if you change your name and look now, it’s too late for your hands ever to be clean. And that’s why this all smacks of profound disrespect to Mr. Capsis by his former team, and malpractice on the part of his lawyer (his lawyer!)
NWVN knew all the locals, restaurants and building managers who stack the paper in lobbies are familiar with the WVN look and wouldn’t even know (or care) that something was fishy. Were advertisers duped, too?
If you hated what was happening behind the scenes at WVN you could have gone off to be original — as, ironically, *this* paper The Village Sun did. The Sun is gaining traction for your story and you all look like selfish wannabe “journalists.”
The chutzpah!
Absolutely revolting self-serving article trying to legitimize hijacking someone’s 20-plus-year work! Arthur Schwartz, Kim Pelosa and the the rest should be ashamed of themselves, period! Schwartz definitely has committed acts against his license and surely should be investigated. What a dispicable act to try to justify taking the name, too. Appalled isn’t even touching on the word to describe how heinous all of them are. Kim wouldn’t have had a position had George Capsis not given it to her. What desperately obscene excuses for stealing an elderly person’s creation! Shame on all of you! “Karma is a patient gangsta.” We hope everyone contacts the grievance committee and bar association on Arthur and that Kim, Liza and the rest are exposed for their theft of a man’s hard-earned work! There is only one Westview News that serves the community and it’s not the “new” anything; it’s the old one that continues to provide new and honest NY stories!
I congratulate the New WestView News staffers!!
We must have read different articles. What was done to the 95-year-old man? Any suggestions on “another solution?”
Like it or not, Westview News is George Capsis’s paper, which he founded nearly twenty years ago. Putting aside the small business infighting and power struggles, it belongs to him and these people are stealing it from him. An insular group of longtime staff seem to view Berke as an interloper, and she may well be, but executing a coup and mirroring the original paper is likely illegal and surely despicable. They should have called in a mediator.
What a loathsome thing to do to a 95-year-old man, causing such anguish to him as he embraces his last chapters. Surely there could have been another solution.