Press "Enter" to skip to content

Battle of the busway rages on; Plaintiffs file court appeal

BY THE VILLAGE SUN | Updated Mon., May 18, 1:45 p.m.: Hold that bus — and those bikes, too!

On Mon., May 11, Village attorney Arthur Schwartz filed an appeal in New York State Appellate Court, seeking to end both the 14th St. busway and the new crosstown bike lanes on 12th and 13th Sts. 

The lawsuit is filed against one person only — Polly Trottenberg, as commissioner of the city’s Department of Transportation.

The plaintiffs include the Council of Chelsea Block Associations, with its president, William Borock; the Flatiron Alliance, with its co-directors, Michele Golden and Susan Finley; the W. 12th St. Block Association, with its co-chairperson, Marguerite Martin; the Upper W. 13th St. Block Association, with its president, Jeffrey Ryan; and the W. 13th St. 100 Block Association, with its president, Gary Tomei.

With New York City on lockdown due to the coronavirus pandemic, mass transit use has plummeted. Yet, the 14th St. busway continues operating — and fueling local opposition.

Speaking to The Village Sun, Schwartz said, “Subway ridership is down 92 percent and people aren’t taking buses.”

The subways — which were seeing homeless “shantytowns” pop up inside of them — are now being cleared of riders every morning, so that the cars can be disinfected.

“But now all the homeless people are sleeping on the buses,” Schwartz said. “Nobody’s taking Uber either. Who knows who was sitting in that seat before you and if they clean it?”

Indeed, there is a fear among many that the city’s mass transit system is a vector for spreading coronavirus in the Big Apple, the pandemic’s U.S. epicenter. As of April 22, more than 80 Metropolitan Transportation Authority workers had died from COVID-19.

One thing is clear, Schwartz said, “The world is going to change.”

Meanwhile, the lawsuit appeal argues that because the city violated the requirement to do an environmental review (under the State Environmental Quality Review Act) for the novel transit plan, the busway and bike lanes must be stopped.

Simply put, Schwartz said, “They never did the proper environmental assessment for a project of this size.”

The suit describes the busway and crosstown bike lanes as two “intertwined” parts of the city’s mitigation scheme that was originally proposed in response to the planned full shutdown of the L train for repairs. 

After Governor Cuomo’s intervention, the full L-train shutdown was scaled back to a partial shutdown (the L tunnel repairs recently were completed), but the city — flipping the script — then argued that the M14 crosstown bus was too slow, so the busway was still needed.

The busway was launched in October 2019 as an 18-month pilot project, but not before Schwartz — representing some of the same plaintiffs as the current ones — delayed its start a couple of times. Schwartz, who lives on W. 12th St., is once again arguing the suit pro bono.

The city announced the plan in April 2019. Schwartz got a stay in court in June 2019, blocking the busway’s launch. The stay was lifted, then reimposed, then lifted again in September 2019, before the busway went into effect shortly thereafter. 

The first-of-its-kind program bans cars from 14th St. between Third Ave. and Ninth Ave. between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. seven days a week. Only buses and trucks are allowed as through traffic during those hours. Cars and taxis can come onto the crosstown boulevard but must then take their first right-hand turn off of it.

The lawsuit notes the plaintiffs fear the scheme will become permanent.

“The City called this an ‘18-month pilot project,’ but given its determination since 2017 to impose these changes, only because of the L-train shutdown, there is no reason not to believe that a permanent change is what is in store,” the lawsuit predicts.

The suit pegs the plan’s genesis on Transportation Alternatives.

“In April 2017, a bike-riding advocacy group, Transportation Alternatives, with whom Commissioner Trottenberg is closely associated, announced the winners of a contest about how best to mitigate the effects of the L-Train shutdown,” the lawsuit states. “The contest winner proposed, among other things, a ‘Busway’ running across 14th Street, which would bar all traffic other than buses.”

Cuomo scaled back the L-train repairs to only a partial shutdown, but D.O.T. continued to push the busway plan as critically needed.

“Its new rationale was a need to ‘speed up’ bus service on 14th Street,” the suit states of D.O.T., “even though 14th Street was one of two crosstown streets in Manhattan that had a subway line running across almost its entire length.”

Meanwhile, the suit notes, from the start, neighboring residents feared that barring cars from 14th St. would push the vehicles onto their side streets — mainly, 18th, 19th, 20th and 12th and 13th Sts. (Union Square Park blocks 15th through 17th Sts. from being good east-west streets for through traffic, and streets in Greenwich Village and the East village don’t provide direct connections to West St. or the F.D.R. Drive until one gets down to Houston St., while Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village block access to the F.D.R., the suit notes.)

“Under the Busway Plan, 12th Street, 13th Street, and 17th to 20th Streets are the only ways to get across Manhattan between Houston and 23rd Streets,” the suit states. “Residents of those…streets and neighboring streets have grave concerns regarding the rerouting of commercial traffic (i.e., vans and trucks that are not planning to travel all the way across 14th Street), livery vehicles, and other passenger vehicles onto those streets. All of these streets are narrow mixed-use/residential streets that are already constantly backed up with traffic. Because of existing building construction, cars, bikes and delivery trucks, traffic on these streets is already often at a virtual standstill. 

“Twelfth and 13th Streets, with a bikeway…have such a narrow car lane that a car or taxi stopping to pick someone up will stop traffic entirely,” the suit adds. “An oil delivery truck will shut down the block for 30 to 60 minutes unless it parks, unlawfully, in the bike lane.

“These are wholly residential streets which exist in several Historic Districts, including the Greenwich Village Historic District,” the litigation notes.

The bike lanes and accompanying street reconfigurations — taking away 7 to 8 feet of roadway for vehicle traffic — on 12th and 13th Sts. are also safety risks, the suit argues, since these streets are used by ambulances from the Lenox Health Greenwich Village emergency department that also travel across town to Beth Israel Hospital, as well as by fire trucks from the firehouse at W. 10th St. and Sixth Ave.

“Blocking or causing traffic jams on those streets causes a serious, if not life-threatening, hazard,” the suit warns.

“No new rationale has been stated for the two bike lanes constructed before the [L-train] shutdown was called off, which were supposed to be ‘temporary’ and were designed to serve 2,500 to 5,000 L-train riders who chose to bicycle across Greenwich Village,” the suit notes.

Of course, the new protected bike lanes do make riding crosstown exponentially safer for cyclists.

The suit adds that D.O.T. said the main traffic problems on 14th St. were during the morning and evening rush hours (8 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.), yet the current no-cars pilot plan extends from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Village and Chelsea opponents of the plan have said that, at the very least, the busway could be scaled back to only during rush hours.

In addition, the community lawsuit also alleges that the increased bus speed that D.O.T. sought on 14th St. was likely already achieved after the city put Select Bus Service into effect just before the busway’s start, along with banning left turns on 14th St., making University Place between 14th and 13th Sts. southbound and implementing other traffic changes.

As Schwartz put it, “The numbers show the biggest improvement [in bus speed] when they went to S.B.S., and a smaller improvement after the busway started.”

The plaintiffs do not oppose S.B.S. on 14th St.

The city now has until Aug. 12 to respond to the plaintiffs’ appeal, and the case will be argued in September at the earliest, according to Schwartz. At that point, the busway pilot project would still be operating, with six to seven months left to go.

Transit-advocacy groups slammed the attempt to continue the litigation.

“As our city faces a public health crisis and massive budget cuts, it’s a shame that Mr. Schwartz continues to target hardworking New Yorkers with his frivolous lawsuits,” said Danny Harris, executive director of Transportation Alternatives. “Our transit system is a lifeline for essential workers. Bus-priority corridors like 14th St. have improved the quality and speed of bus service, and ought to be the standard for every community.”

The Riders Alliance accused Schwartz of pursuing the suit because of his “ego.”

“Schwartz’s appeal is misguided on the facts and on the law,” Danny Pearlstein, the group’s spokesperson, said. “He should spend his time advancing the interests of bus riders not vindicating his own ego.

“The project was meticulously vetted by teams of risk-averse lawyers at the City and the M.T.A. Two Supreme Court justices in Manhattan and Queens have ruled against his arguments.

“The busway itself is enormously beneficial to tens of thousands of bus riders, primarily low-income New Yorkers of color, large numbers of them essential workers. Dramatic speed improvements were followed by major growth in bus ridership.

“In the age of COVID, Mayor de Blasio should advance projects like the busway on busy commercial corridors citywide,” Pearlstein said. “With the M.T.A. facing a financial quagmire and several hundred thousand daily riders still depending on buses, neither the agency nor New Yorkers can afford getting stuck in slow traffic.”

5 Comments

  1. Jessica Jessica May 15, 2020

    Mr. Schwartz is an entittled muli -millionare who actually compared the Rider Alliance people to the KKK. He presents himself as a progressive who fights for working people but when those people especially the old and disabled have to ride buses that might go more than 5 miles an hour he litigates to make sure the traffic does not increase in front of his very expensive house. I am sure Covid will radically change things but as a regular rider of the 14 Bus I can tell the difference of before and after the busway is night and day. Other than after midnight it was the slowest bus in the city crawling down. I go from 8th to C to visit a friend in Stuy town and could literally take an hour anytime between 6 and 10 and while I just have a bad foot the bus is filled with the disabled, workers going to the lower east side and many elderly folks for whom the L train is NOT on option. We are so sorry Mr. Schwartz is inconvenienced by more traffic in front of his 10 millon dollar brownstone.

    • David R. Marcus David R. Marcus May 17, 2020

      Since when does wealth become a relevant argument when discussing the propriety of the 14th Street Busway and 12th/13th Street bikeways when the genesis of the plan was promoted by Transportation Alternatives with its multi-million dollar lobbying and operational budget funded by some of the very wealthiest interlopers with no connection or investment in the community and staffed by hired gun leadership earning mid six figure salaries, far higher than many of us locals earn; also funded by those same super-rich donors.

      Perhaps you notice a difference in speed, negligible at that, but it pales by comparison to the difference and problems we notice on our narrow streets and residential neighborhoods making the balance of need weighted in favor of the vast minority of the commuting public over the much larger majority of residents and businesses.

      And while talking of the needs of elderly and disabled, where is your outrage at the elimination of 12-14 bus stops depended upon by those folks in the name of a moderate increase in bus speed? How do you claim this benefits them when in fact it burdens them and in some cases prevents them from using the bus?

      Arthur invested in our neighborhood when few wanted to buy here and should not be criticized for recognizing the beauty of our hood nor criticized for giving freely of his time to protect it.

  2. Choresh Wald Choresh Wald May 15, 2020

    As long as Arthur Schwarz repeat the lie that 12th and 13th street bike lanes created congestion his credibility will stay at zero. The bike lanes replaced parked cars. There was no movement of any vehicle on the south side of 13 street between 6th and 7th Av. Nor on the north side of 12 St between 6th and 5th Avenues. There were parked cars there. You don’t need to go far and look for evidence: Googlemaps Street view can expose his lies from the comfort of your computer when quarantined .

  3. Walter Goodman Walter Goodman May 17, 2020

    Why is The Village Sun giving about three times as much space to Schwartz‘s point of view as it does to the Riders’ Alliance? It does seem that that kind of coverage of this issue has been pretty consistent from the Sun. Please represent the positive benefits of kicking cars off of our streets!

  4. The Village Sun The Village Sun May 18, 2020

    In this case, the reason that the opponents (the lawsuit filed by Arthur Schwartz) got more space is because they filed a lawsuit that was something like 50-plus pages long that laid out their various arguments and points explaining why they think the busway is legally required to go through a proper environmental review, which has not happened yet. We reached out for comment to both Transportation Alternatives and the Riders Alliance. Only the Riders Alliance responded at first, and we ran their full comment. TransAlt has now responded and their comment has been added to the article. That the lawsuit appeal was filed was the “new” news.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mission News Theme by Compete Themes.